![]() ![]() Potter said users should continue to “ignore requests for sharing information”. “In any update, they can change access to permissions. Tom Kenyon, a director of Internet 2.0, also urged users to monitor those permissions regularly. Set permissions manually via in-app settings and in the device’s settings. ![]() If you decide to keep using TikTok, Potter suggests being “specific and granular about the level of permissions shared with the app”. TikTok is now the most downloaded mobile entertainment app in Australia, with 7.38 million users over the age of 18. The US made 1,306 requests for 1,003 accounts, with data handed over 86% of the time. TikTok publishes a half-yearly transparency report for data requests from governments.Ĭhina is not on the list of countries, but the list reveals Australian governments in the second half of 2021 made 51 requests for data related to 57 user accounts, with TikTok handing over data 41% of the time. Other governments also use their national security laws to gain access to user data from TikTok. TikTok told a 2020 Senate committee on foreign interference on social media that any request for Australian user data would need to go through a mutual legal assistance treaty process. “But if you’re involved in something more sensitive or discussing topics that are sensitive … you’ve become very interesting to them very quickly.”Ī dissident in the Chinese diaspora community, or a critic of the Chinese government, might be “extremely concerned about their personal cyber security” on TikTok, Paterson said. And “who you are” may determine the “level of risk” you are taking.Īt an individual level, the average user might not be at immediate risk, Potter said. ![]() “You’re in a different digital ecosystem when you’re on a mainstream Chinese app,” Potter said. Under China’s national security laws Chinese companies are, upon request from the government, required to share access to data they collect. Thomas said Australian data had never been given to the Chinese government. The letter was in response to questions from Senator James Paterson, the opposition’s cyber security and foreign interference spokesperson. “Our security teams minimise the number of people who have access to data and limit it only to people who need that access in order to do their jobs,” Brent Thomas, the company’s Australian director of public policy, wrote in a letter. This month TikTok Australia admitted its staff in China were able to access Australian data. TikTok is owned by ByteDance, which was founded by Zhang Yiming. Potter has said it wasn’t clear what data was being sent, just that the app was connecting to Chinese servers. By sending tracked bots to the app, Internet 2.0 “consistently saw … data geolocating back to China”. “They are consistent in saying their app doesn’t connect to China, isn’t accessible to Chinese authorities and wouldn’t cooperate with Chinese authorities,” Potter said.īut he said Internet 2.0’s research found “Chinese authorities can actually access device data”. 28 on Bloomberg’s billionaires index.īyteDance has denied a connection to the Chinese government in the past, and called the claim “misinformation” after various leaks suggested it censors material that does not align with Chinese foreign policy aims or mentions the country’s human rights record. TikTok is owned by the Chinese multinational internet company ByteDance, which is headquartered in Beijing. Does TikTok have connections with the Chinese government? “We believe the justification system iOS implements systematically limits a culture of ‘grab what you can’ in data harvesting, “ the report states. It has a justification system so that if a developer wants access to something it must justify why this is required before it is granted. Most of the concern in the report focuses on permissions sought on Android devices, because Apple’s iOS significantly limits what information an app can gather. This leads us to believe that the only reason this information has been gathered is for data harvesting,” it concluded. “The application can and will run successfully without any of this data being gathered. The report labelled the app’s data collection practices “overly intrusive” and questioned their purpose. “If you tell Facebook you don’t want to share something, it won’t ask you again. When a user doesn’t give it permission … persistently asks. “When the app is in use, it has significantly more permissions than it really needs,” said Robert Potter, co-CEO of Internet 2.0 and one of the editors of the report.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |